There really isn’t any actual “game” to Mad Libs. Apples to Apples and Cards Against Humanity rely on a judge. With both games your strategy is really only to pair a “Card A” with a “Card B”. One acts as a sort of question and the other acts as a sort of answer. What I discovered is that you could put some kind of subject phrase as “Card A” and then have any number of descriptive or complimentary single word “Card B’s” that could be nouns, adjectives, prefixes, suffixes, gerunds, verbs, curse words and compound words. You can kind of think of them as hashtags. In fact, some of subjects in Wordy Durds are phrased as hashtags to tease out #hashtag responses. I also discovered that although you could combine those words to “make a thing”, which is the natural response, you didn’t have to. Those words could just be humorous or fitting from their connotations and associations.  For example, the words Fluffy and Scrotum don’t have to produce a ‘Fluffy Scrotum” (although that’s funny AF). The words can simply, through their associations, imply certain things. “Fluffy” has its associations and connotations and so does “Scrotum”. Because the individual words and combinations fit in multiple subjects and because you’re not necessarily trying to identify the “funniest” pairing, you’ve got a game and not a subjective popularity contest. The pairing player gets a point for each correct guess and loses a point for each incorrect guess. The guessing player gets progressively more points per guess (1, 2 & 3) for each correct guess during the round.  Because of the way the scoring works, all players are incentivized to do their best. The only way to guarantee winning is to be a better guesser than your opponent.